t may not seem like much, but at $34 a ton, even
ordinary street salt can break a budget in a city that slathers
300,000 tons a year on its roadways. So New York's Sanitation
Department dispatched a new generation of salt spreaders this
winter, loaded with satellite tracking devices and sensors that can
measure precisely how much salt is dropped per mile and report back
when there is any waste.
Similarly, city environmental officials are using technology to
conserve their resources in monitoring the city's reservoir system
in upstate New York. Last year, they deployed their version of the
Mars rover - known as R.U.S.S., for Remote Underwater Surveillance
System - to take readings once done by inspectors in boats.
The Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications
is also rolling out an interactive three-dimensional map of the
entire cityscape this spring that could someday all but eliminate
the need for on-site surveys. It is expected to be used for
everything from collecting property taxes to bolstering security at
big events to developing architectural plans for the city's 2012
Olympic bid.
This is all part of a technological revolution under way in New
York City government that is rapidly changing the way that its
agencies carry out their functions and provide services to
residents. From rationing street salt to sending out daily e-mail
messages on parking rules, once-lumbering bureaucracies are adopting
the latest scientific advances as a means of cutting costs,
increasing efficiency as well as ensuring greater accountability
after a series of corporate and government corruption scandals.
Many of these changes have been promoted by Mayor Michael R.
Bloomberg, whose pet project last year was the creation of a 311
hotline to centralize information about city services and take
complaints from residents at the touch of a button.
Under the Bloomberg administration, spending on technology across
all city agencies has risen steadily to an estimated $1 billion this
year, even as spending in other areas has been trimmed. The move to
modernize is also part of a larger trend, one that many cities, long
known for their dusty ways, are embracing.
William Lehr, a research associate at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, said that since the late 1990's, municipal
governments, large and small, have been rushing to take advantage of
what he described as a convergence of better and cheaper
technologies.
"You don't have to be the C.I.A. or General Motors or Boeing to
take advantage of computing and information technology anymore," he
said. "Cheap computing, the Internet and wireless data services now
make these capabilities available to small businesses, local
governments and consumers."
Mayor Bloomberg and his commissioners view technology as an
essential component for improving governmental operations, whether
that means consolidating and updating database systems or
introducing sophisticated gadgets like hand-held computers and
satellite-tracking devices. "I have always believed, if used
correctly, technology makes people more efficient," Mayor Bloomberg
said in an interview. "It does not replace people. In the end, it's
in their interests."
But the new technology is also meeting resistance from critics
who question the high start-up costs, and from some city workers who
said they experienced glitches in the transition. Last month, for
instance, the Buildings Department started using mapping technology
that was supposed to schedule plumbing inspections more efficiently,
by grouping the appointments together by location. However, some
inspectors were initially bounced from the East Side to the West
Side and back.
"That was certainly one of the rough spots," said Mark H.
Topping, a deputy buildings commissioner, adding that the system is
now running smoothly. The new technology, with its seemingly
boundless capabilities, has also raised concerns about privacy.
Norman Siegel, a civil rights lawyer, said employers will
increasingly be able to keep tabs on workers at any moment, even
during lunch hours or on weekends. "It's going to raise serious and
substantial issues about privacy for city workers as this technology
is employed in the workplace," he said.